1. The man was harassed and then he was pushed by the man who was harassing the 58 year old Ki Shuk Han. He was able to take the photo becuase trying to warn the train that someone fell down.
2. He said that he tried warn the driver but it did not work and he had token some photos on the ways it was coming.
3. I do not think he should have token the photo because you should have at least tried to pull him up because even with broken legs, he could have been saved.
4. I think he only helped partly because he flashed his camera and instead should have helped him and pulled him up.
5. I think it was not a good idea because they will get a lot of pressure by the public and I think the lost a profit with putting that on the magazine.
6. I think to a photo journalist, it is the image that matters. This is basically life unfolding in front of them because there are photographers that take photos of and animal killing another animal. The more dramatic, the better the picture to them.
7. I do not think it is ethically right to take a photo of a person dying when you had the chance to make a difference. Instead of taking the photo he had a split second which could result with him alive. The man could be alive but then, this is what he does for a living which is what we forget.
8. They should with a human because in society human lives are more worthy. Not with animals because you want nature to unfold from prey to predator.
9. That he was flashing his camera and waving trying to get the attention of the driver. RThis at least puts an image that he tried.
2. He said that he tried warn the driver but it did not work and he had token some photos on the ways it was coming.
3. I do not think he should have token the photo because you should have at least tried to pull him up because even with broken legs, he could have been saved.
4. I think he only helped partly because he flashed his camera and instead should have helped him and pulled him up.
5. I think it was not a good idea because they will get a lot of pressure by the public and I think the lost a profit with putting that on the magazine.
6. I think to a photo journalist, it is the image that matters. This is basically life unfolding in front of them because there are photographers that take photos of and animal killing another animal. The more dramatic, the better the picture to them.
7. I do not think it is ethically right to take a photo of a person dying when you had the chance to make a difference. Instead of taking the photo he had a split second which could result with him alive. The man could be alive but then, this is what he does for a living which is what we forget.
8. They should with a human because in society human lives are more worthy. Not with animals because you want nature to unfold from prey to predator.
9. That he was flashing his camera and waving trying to get the attention of the driver. RThis at least puts an image that he tried.
